head to head · open source
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs cve
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,804 GitHub stars, 4,364 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. cve has 8,197 stars, 981 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 337% (35,804 vs 8,197 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; cve is written in HTML under MIT. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, cve 12%. cve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (infosec), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | cve | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 8.2K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 981 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cve if
- You want the cve feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and cve fits your workflow better
About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills The largest open source cybersecurity skills library for AI agents 818 production grade cybersecurity skills · 34 security domains · 6 framework mappings · 26+ AI platforms Get Started · What's Inside · Frameworks · Platforms · Contributing ⚠️ Community Project — This is an independent, community created project. Not affiliated with Anthropic PBC. 🔐 Authorized & lawful use only. This library includes offensive and dual use techniques (e.g. red team C2, phishing simulation, exploitation) intended for authorized penetration testing, security research, defense, and education . Only…
read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →
About cve
CVE PoC Almost every publicly available CVE PoC. Current hottest CVEs To see the complete history go here How it works Trickest Workflow Architecture TB; DZ (Too big; didn't zoom): Collect CVE details from cvelist (Shout out to CVE Project!) Split CVEs up by year. Find PoCs for each CVE using 2 techniques: 1. References Gather each CVE's References . Check if any of them points to a PoC using ffuf and a list of keywords Regex: (Thanks @joohoi!) Note : ffuf is awesome for more purposes than just content discovery. Get CVE referenced in HackerOne Reports AllVideoPocsFromHackerOne (Thanks @zeroc00I!) 2. Github…
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or cve more popular?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,804 GitHub stars and cve has 8,197. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.
Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and cve free?
Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cve under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and cve?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and cve in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or cve?
Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (35,804 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cve if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.