head to head · open source

readest vs 101-linux-commands

readest has 24,425 GitHub stars, 1,587 forks, 145 open issues and last shipped today. 101-linux-commands has 1,130 stars, 141 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. readest leads on adoption by 2,062% (24,425 vs 1,130 stars). readest is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; 101-linux-commands is written in HTML under MIT. readest has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, 101-linux-commands 12%. readest was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ebook), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

readest ★ 24K 101-linux-commands ★ 1.1K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

readest 101-linux-commands
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 1.1K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript HTML
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-03-24
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 141
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick readest if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full readest profile →

pick 101-linux-commands if

  • You want the 101-linux-commands feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and 101-linux-commands fits your workflow better

full 101-linux-commands profile →

About readest

Readest is an open source, cross platform ebook reader built with Next.js 16 and Tauri v2 for readers who want one modern library across macOS, Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, and the web.

read the full readest overview →

About 101-linux-commands

101 Linux commands is an open source, MIT licensed eBook that teaches the 101 Linux commands everyone should know, written for DevOps and SysOps engineers, developers, and Linux enthusiasts who will have to use the terminal at some point in their careers.

read the full 101-linux-commands overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs readest lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre koreader vs koodo-reader lerna vs ebook2audiobook koreader vs calibre lerna vs calibre-web next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

readest vs lerna readest vs koreader readest vs koodo-reader readest vs calibre readest vs ebook2audiobook readest vs calibre-web readest vs LibreTranslate readest vs PyMuPDF readest vs so-novel readest vs papermill readest vs Calibre-Web-Automated readest vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is readest or 101-linux-commands more popular?

readest has 24,425 GitHub stars and 101-linux-commands has 1,130. readest has the larger community by that measure.

Are readest and 101-linux-commands free?

Both are open source. readest is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and 101-linux-commands under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between readest and 101-linux-commands?

readest is written in TypeScript and 101-linux-commands in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, readest or 101-linux-commands?

Choose readest if you want the larger community (24,425 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose 101-linux-commands if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.