head to head · open source

readest vs Calibre-Web-Automated

readest has 25,874 GitHub stars, 1,805 forks, 145 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Calibre-Web-Automated has 6,537 stars, 565 forks, 443 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. readest leads on adoption by 296% (25,874 vs 6,537 stars). readest is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Calibre-Web-Automated is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. readest has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Calibre-Web-Automated 9%. readest was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (calibre, ebook, epub, kindle), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

readest ★ 26K Calibre-Web-Automated ★ 6.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

readest Calibre-Web-Automated
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 6.5K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-09
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 565
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick readest if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full readest profile →

pick Calibre-Web-Automated if

  • You want the Calibre-Web-Automated feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Calibre-Web-Automated fits your workflow better

full Calibre-Web-Automated profile →

About readest

Readest [Readest][link website] is an open source ebook reader designed for immersive and deep reading experiences. Built as a modern rewrite of Foliate, it leverages Next.js 16 and Tauri v2 to deliver a smooth, cross platform experience across macOS, Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, and the Web. [![Website][badge website]][link website] [![Web App][badge web app]][link web readest] [![OS][badge platforms]][link website] [![Discord][badge discord]][link discord] [![Reddit][badge reddit]][link reddit] [![AGPL Licence][badge license]](LICENSE) [![Language Coverage][badge language coverage]][link locales]…

read the full readest overview →

About Calibre-Web-Automated

Calibre Web Automated (formerly Calibre Web Automator) Making Calibre Web your dream , all in one self hosted digital library solution. Supporting the Project ❤️ CWA is and always will be free and open source. If it makes your library life easier and you're able to support development, contributions go directly to: Testing hardware (ereader devices & tablets ect.) Development tools and infrastructure Coffee ☕ (lots of coffee) Quick Access Features 🪄 Releases 🆕 Roadmap 🛣️ How to Install: 📖 Quick Install 🚀 Docker Compose 🐋⭐(Recommended) Users Migrating from stock Calibre Web 🔄 Post Install Tasks 🏁 Default…

read the full Calibre-Web-Automated overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is readest or Calibre-Web-Automated more popular?

readest has 25,874 GitHub stars and Calibre-Web-Automated has 6,537. readest has the larger community by that measure.

Are readest and Calibre-Web-Automated free?

Both are open source. readest is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Calibre-Web-Automated under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between readest and Calibre-Web-Automated?

readest is written in TypeScript and Calibre-Web-Automated in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, readest or Calibre-Web-Automated?

Choose readest if you want the larger community (25,874 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Calibre-Web-Automated if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.