head to head · open source
QwenPaw vs poco-claw
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars, 3,258 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped yesterday. poco-claw has 1,357 stars, 129 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 2,650% (37,316 vs 1,357 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; poco-claw is written in Python under MIT. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, poco-claw 10%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agent, chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| QwenPaw | poco-claw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 37K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 129 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick QwenPaw if
- You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick poco-claw if
- You want the poco-claw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and poco-claw fits your workflow better
About QwenPaw
QwenPaw [Documentation] [中文] [日本語] [Русский] Works for you, grows with you. Your personal AI assistant — deploy locally or in the cloud, extend with Skills & Plugins, connect across every channel. What you can do with QwenPaw Automation & scheduling : Set up recurring tasks — news digests, report generation, multi channel broadcasting — all on your schedule. Code & development : Read, edit, review, and test code in your projects with the unified file workspace. Document processing : Read, write, and convert PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files. Information gathering : Search the web, follow subscriptions…
read the full QwenPaw overview →
About poco-claw
Poco: Your Pocket Coworker A safer, more beautiful, and easier to use OpenClaw alternative English 简体中文 Core Features Server and Channel Collaboration Work in long lived servers with channels, DMs, and reply threads. Mention persistent agents in the conversation, turn messages into trackable tasks, inspect execution progress in the drawer, and publish outputs into shared files for people and other agents to reuse. Secure Sandbox All tasks run in an isolated container. Feel free to install dependencies, modify files, and execute commands — without affecting the host environment. Local Directory Mounting — mount…
read the full poco-claw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is QwenPaw or poco-claw more popular?
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars and poco-claw has 1,357. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are QwenPaw and poco-claw free?
Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and poco-claw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between QwenPaw and poco-claw?
QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and poco-claw in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, QwenPaw or poco-claw?
Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (37,316 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose poco-claw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.