head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs QwenPaw
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars, 5,172 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. QwenPaw has 37,316 stars, 3,258 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 43% (53,242 vs 37,316 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, QwenPaw 9%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | QwenPaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 37K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 3.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick QwenPaw if
- You want the QwenPaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and QwenPaw fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About QwenPaw
QwenPaw [Documentation] [中文] [日本語] [Русский] Works for you, grows with you. Your personal AI assistant — deploy locally or in the cloud, extend with Skills & Plugins, connect across every channel. What you can do with QwenPaw Automation & scheduling : Set up recurring tasks — news digests, report generation, multi channel broadcasting — all on your schedule. Code & development : Read, edit, review, and test code in your projects with the unified file workspace. Document processing : Read, write, and convert PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files. Information gathering : Search the web, follow subscriptions…
read the full QwenPaw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or QwenPaw more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars and QwenPaw has 37,316. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and QwenPaw free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and QwenPaw under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and QwenPaw?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and QwenPaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or QwenPaw?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,242 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose QwenPaw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.