head to head · open source

qutebrowser vs luakit

qutebrowser has 11,699 GitHub stars, 1,130 forks, 1,335 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. luakit has 2,313 stars, 254 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. qutebrowser leads on adoption by 406% (11,699 vs 2,313 stars). qutebrowser is written in Python under GPL-3.0; luakit is written in Lua under GPL-3.0. qutebrowser has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, luakit 11%. qutebrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

qutebrowser ★ 12K luakit ★ 2.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

qutebrowser luakit
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 2.3K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Python Lua
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-06-01
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 254
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick qutebrowser if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full qutebrowser profile →

pick luakit if

  • You want the luakit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and luakit fits your workflow better

full luakit profile →

About qutebrowser

qutebrowser is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed, keyboard driven browser with a minimal GUI, built on Python and Qt, for people who want vim style keyboard control of the web rather than a mouse.

read the full qutebrowser overview →

About luakit

Luakit is a fast, small, and simple micro browser framework built around the WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is extensible by Lua, so browser behavior and user workflows can be shaped through Lua configuration files instead of only through fixed settings screens.

read the full luakit overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

qutebrowser vs uBlock qutebrowser vs Ladybird qutebrowser vs chrome-devtools-mcp qutebrowser vs monaco-editor qutebrowser vs Zen Browser qutebrowser vs servo qutebrowser vs serenity qutebrowser vs refined-github qutebrowser vs slate qutebrowser vs Avalonia qutebrowser vs webtorrent qutebrowser vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is qutebrowser or luakit more popular?

qutebrowser has 11,699 GitHub stars and luakit has 2,313. qutebrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are qutebrowser and luakit free?

Both are open source. qutebrowser is licensed under GPL-3.0 and luakit under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between qutebrowser and luakit?

qutebrowser is written in Python and luakit in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, qutebrowser or luakit?

Choose qutebrowser if you want the larger community (11,699 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose luakit if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.