head to head · open source
qinglong vs organice
qinglong has 20,061 GitHub stars, 3,227 forks, 108 open issues and last shipped yesterday. organice has 2,701 stars, 172 forks, 117 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. qinglong leads on adoption by 643% (20,061 vs 2,701 stars). qinglong is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; organice is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. qinglong has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, organice 6%. qinglong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| qinglong | organice | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 2.7K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 172 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick qinglong if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick organice if
- You want the organice feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and organice fits your workflow better
About qinglong
青龙 简体中文 English 支持 Python3、JavaScript、Shell、Typescript 的定时任务管理平台 Timed task management platform supporting Python3, JavaScript, Shell, Typescript [![npm version][npm version image]][npm version url] [![docker pulls][docker pulls image]][docker pulls url] [![docker stars][docker stars image]][docker stars url] [![docker image size][docker image size image]][docker image size url] [npm version image]: [npm version url]: [docker pulls image]: [docker pulls url]: [docker stars image]: [docker stars url]: [docker image size image]: [docker image size url]: Demo / Issues / Telegram Channel / Buy Me a Coffee 演示 / 反馈 /…
read the full qinglong overview →
About organice
org adapt indentation: nil; fill column: 70; +title: organice documentation +html: organice /'ɔ:gənaɪz/ +html: organice organizes Org files nicely! +html: General :PROPERTIES: :CUSTOM ID: general :END: Code REPO PLACEHOLDER INFO: We're using inline = +HTML= notation in favor of the much more readable = +BEGIN EXPORT html= notation, because GitHub uses legacy Org parsers and wouldn't render the latter. GitHub would render the legacy notation = +BEGIN HTML= which will not be properly exported from Emacs, because it's legacy. Hence the glorious solution: Write all HTML in one line. +HTML: Getting started…
read the full organice overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is qinglong or organice more popular?
qinglong has 20,061 GitHub stars and organice has 2,701. qinglong has the larger community by that measure.
Are qinglong and organice free?
Both are open source. qinglong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and organice under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between qinglong and organice?
qinglong is written in JavaScript and organice in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, qinglong or organice?
Choose qinglong if you want the larger community (20,061 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose organice if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.