head to head · open source
qinglong vs Operately
qinglong has 20,061 GitHub stars, 3,227 forks, 108 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Operately has 613 stars, 85 forks, 85 open issues and last shipped yesterday. qinglong leads on adoption by 3,173% (20,061 vs 613 stars). qinglong is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; Operately is written in Elixir under a custom or non-standard licence. qinglong has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Operately 14%. Operately was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (typescript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| qinglong | Operately | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 613 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | JavaScript | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 85 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick qinglong if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Operately if
- You want the Operately feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and Operately fits your workflow better
About qinglong
青龙 简体中文 English 支持 Python3、JavaScript、Shell、Typescript 的定时任务管理平台 Timed task management platform supporting Python3, JavaScript, Shell, Typescript [![npm version][npm version image]][npm version url] [![docker pulls][docker pulls image]][docker pulls url] [![docker stars][docker stars image]][docker stars url] [![docker image size][docker image size image]][docker image size url] [npm version image]: [npm version url]: [docker pulls image]: [docker pulls url]: [docker stars image]: [docker stars url]: [docker image size image]: [docker image size url]: Demo / Issues / Telegram Channel / Buy Me a Coffee 演示 / 反馈 /…
read the full qinglong overview →
About Operately
Operately Open source company operating system Discord · Website About Operately Operately helps you coordinate goals, projects, and teams without the need for a COO. Traditional work management tools give you infinite flexibility but zero guidance on how to actually run an organization. This creates chaos and drains your energy. Operately is different. Instead of being another generic project management tool, it's an opinionated operating system that provides the structure and discipline your company needs to get things done as your team grows. Unlike Notion or ClickUp that let you build anything but leave you…
read the full Operately overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is qinglong or Operately more popular?
qinglong has 20,061 GitHub stars and Operately has 613. qinglong has the larger community by that measure.
Are qinglong and Operately free?
Both are open source. qinglong is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Operately has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between qinglong and Operately?
qinglong is written in JavaScript and Operately in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, qinglong or Operately?
Choose qinglong if you want the larger community (20,061 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Operately if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.