head to head · open source

qinglong vs Kan

qinglong has 19,887 GitHub stars, 3,232 forks, 108 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kan has 5,656 stars, 477 forks, 135 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. qinglong leads on adoption by 252% (19,887 vs 5,656 stars). qinglong is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Kan is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. qinglong has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Kan 8%. qinglong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (typescript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

qinglong ★ 20K Kan ★ 5.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

qinglong Kan
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 5.7K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 477
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick qinglong if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full qinglong profile →

pick Kan if

  • You want the Kan feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Kan fits your workflow better

full Kan profile →

About qinglong

Qinglong is a self hosted timed task management platform that schedules and runs Python 3, JavaScript, Shell, and TypeScript scripts from a web interface, built for developers and operators who want central control over scheduled jobs instead of hand editing crontab on every machine.

read the full qinglong overview →

About Kan

Kan is an open source project management application that provides kanban boards, positioned by its maintainers as the open source alternative to Trello. It is written in TypeScript under the AGPL 3.0 license, and it lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem: the stack is built on Next.js, tRPC, Better Auth, Tailwind CSS, Drizzle ORM, React Email, Zod, and Turborepo. The repository has gathered 5,634 stars and 472 forks, with 135 open issues, and its homepage is hosted at kan.bn. It is actively maintained, with the most recent push recorded on 14 September 2026.

read the full Kan overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

vibe-kanban vs qinglong wekan vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev vibe-kanban vs planka vibe-kanban vs leantime plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

qinglong vs vibe-kanban qinglong vs Wekan qinglong vs edict qinglong vs OpenProject qinglong vs onedev qinglong vs Planka qinglong vs Leantime qinglong vs kanboard qinglong vs Kaneo qinglong vs ccpm qinglong vs Fizzy qinglong vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is qinglong or Kan more popular?

qinglong has 19,887 GitHub stars and Kan has 5,656. qinglong has the larger community by that measure.

Are qinglong and Kan free?

Both are open source. qinglong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kan under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between qinglong and Kan?

qinglong is written in TypeScript and Kan in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, qinglong or Kan?

Choose qinglong if you want the larger community (19,887 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Kan if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.