head to head · open source
qinglong vs Kan
qinglong has 20,061 GitHub stars, 3,227 forks, 108 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kan has 5,868 stars, 528 forks, 135 open issues and last shipped yesterday. qinglong leads on adoption by 242% (20,061 vs 5,868 stars). qinglong is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; Kan is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. qinglong has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Kan 9%. qinglong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (typescript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| qinglong | Kan | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 5.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 528 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick qinglong if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Kan if
- You want the Kan feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Kan fits your workflow better
About qinglong
青龙 简体中文 English 支持 Python3、JavaScript、Shell、Typescript 的定时任务管理平台 Timed task management platform supporting Python3, JavaScript, Shell, Typescript [![npm version][npm version image]][npm version url] [![docker pulls][docker pulls image]][docker pulls url] [![docker stars][docker stars image]][docker stars url] [![docker image size][docker image size image]][docker image size url] [npm version image]: [npm version url]: [docker pulls image]: [docker pulls url]: [docker stars image]: [docker stars url]: [docker image size image]: [docker image size url]: Demo / Issues / Telegram Channel / Buy Me a Coffee 演示 / 反馈 /…
read the full qinglong overview →
About Kan
Kan The open source project management alternative to Trello. Roadmap · Website · Docs · Discord Features 💫 👁️ Board Visibility : Control who can view and edit your boards 🤝 Workspace Members : Invite members and collaborate with your team 🚀 Trello Imports : Easily import your Trello boards 🔍 Labels & Filters : Organise and find cards quickly 💬 Comments : Discuss and collaborate with your team 📝 Activity Log : Track all card changes with detailed activity history 🎨 Templates : Save time with reusable custom board templates ⚡️ Integrations (coming soon) : Connect your favourite tools See our roadmap for…
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is qinglong or Kan more popular?
qinglong has 20,061 GitHub stars and Kan has 5,868. qinglong has the larger community by that measure.
Are qinglong and Kan free?
Both are open source. qinglong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kan under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between qinglong and Kan?
qinglong is written in JavaScript and Kan in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, qinglong or Kan?
Choose qinglong if you want the larger community (20,061 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Kan if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.