head to head · open source
qinglong vs gronx
qinglong has 20,061 GitHub stars, 3,227 forks, 108 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gronx has 515 stars, 38 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. qinglong leads on adoption by 3,795% (20,061 vs 515 stars). qinglong is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; gronx is written in Go under MIT. qinglong has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, gronx 7%. qinglong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crontab), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| qinglong | gronx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 515 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 38 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick qinglong if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gronx if
- You want the gronx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and gronx fits your workflow better
About qinglong
青龙 简体中文 English 支持 Python3、JavaScript、Shell、Typescript 的定时任务管理平台 Timed task management platform supporting Python3, JavaScript, Shell, Typescript [![npm version][npm version image]][npm version url] [![docker pulls][docker pulls image]][docker pulls url] [![docker stars][docker stars image]][docker stars url] [![docker image size][docker image size image]][docker image size url] [npm version image]: [npm version url]: [docker pulls image]: [docker pulls url]: [docker stars image]: [docker stars url]: [docker image size image]: [docker image size url]: Demo / Issues / Telegram Channel / Buy Me a Coffee 演示 / 反馈 /…
read the full qinglong overview →
About gronx
adhocore/gronx gronx is Golang cron expression parser ported from adhocore/cron expr with task runner and daemon that supports crontab like task list file. Use it programatically in Golang or as standalone binary instead of crond. If that's not enough, you can use gronx to find the next ( NextTick() ) or previous ( PrevTick() ) run time of an expression from any arbitrary point of time. Zero dependency. Very fast because it bails early in case a segment doesn't match. Built in crontab like daemon. Supports time granularity of Seconds. Find gronx in pkg.go.dev. Installation As a Go library Using Bash install…
read the full gronx overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is qinglong or gronx more popular?
qinglong has 20,061 GitHub stars and gronx has 515. qinglong has the larger community by that measure.
Are qinglong and gronx free?
Both are open source. qinglong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gronx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between qinglong and gronx?
qinglong is written in JavaScript and gronx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, qinglong or gronx?
Choose qinglong if you want the larger community (20,061 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose gronx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.