head to head · open source
puck vs f-flow
puck has 13,342 GitHub stars, 977 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. f-flow has 530 stars, 63 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. puck leads on adoption by 2,417% (13,342 vs 530 stars). puck is written in TypeScript under MIT; f-flow is written in TypeScript under MIT. puck has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, f-flow 12%. puck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (drag-and-drop), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| puck | f-flow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 13K | ★ 530 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 977 | ⑂ 63 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick puck if
- You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick f-flow if
- You want the f-flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and f-flow fits your workflow better
About puck
Puck is a modular, open source visual editor for React.js that lets teams assemble their own drag and drop editing experiences from their existing React components, and it is aimed at developers building internal systems or commercial products who want to own both the editor and the data behind it.
About f-flow
Foblex Flow is an MIT licensed, TypeScript, Angular native node editor library for teams building production workflow builders, AI pipelines, and interactive diagram editors, and it is aimed at Angular developers who want drag, connection, selection, and zoom behaviour without adopting a separate state model.
read the full f-flow overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is puck or f-flow more popular?
puck has 13,342 GitHub stars and f-flow has 530. puck has the larger community by that measure.
Are puck and f-flow free?
Both are open source. puck is licensed under MIT and f-flow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between puck and f-flow?
puck is written in TypeScript and f-flow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, puck or f-flow?
Choose puck if you want the larger community (13,342 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose f-flow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.