head to head · open source

puck vs Ethora

puck has 13,342 GitHub stars, 977 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ethora has 546 stars, 111 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. puck leads on adoption by 2,344% (13,342 vs 546 stars). puck is written in TypeScript under MIT; Ethora is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. puck has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Ethora 20%. Ethora was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puck ★ 13K Ethora ★ 546 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

puck Ethora
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 546
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 977 ⑂ 111
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puck if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puck profile →

pick Ethora if

  • You want the Ethora feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Ethora fits your workflow better

full Ethora profile →

About puck

Puck is a modular, open source visual editor for React.js that lets teams assemble their own drag and drop editing experiences from their existing React components, and it is aimed at developers building internal systems or commercial products who want to own both the editor and the data behind it.

read the full puck overview →

About Ethora

Ethora is an Apache 2.0 licensed chat, AI and messaging SDK monorepo that adds real time messaging, prebuilt chat UI, bots and backend services to web, iOS and Android applications, and it is aimed at product teams that would rather integrate a messaging layer than assemble one.

read the full Ethora overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

puck vs n8n puck vs ProxmoxVE puck vs ActivePieces puck vs LiveKit puck vs amis puck vs Windmill puck vs Botpress puck vs mitosis puck vs Automatisch puck vs Typebot puck vs cadence puck vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is puck or Ethora more popular?

puck has 13,342 GitHub stars and Ethora has 546. puck has the larger community by that measure.

Are puck and Ethora free?

Both are open source. puck is licensed under MIT and Ethora under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between puck and Ethora?

puck is written in TypeScript and Ethora in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puck or Ethora?

Choose puck if you want the larger community (13,342 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Ethora if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.