head to head · open source
Plausible vs GEOInflow
Plausible has 29,697 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. GEOInflow has 634 stars, 193 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Plausible leads on adoption by 4,584% (29,697 vs 634 stars). Plausible is written in Elixir under AGPL-3.0; GEOInflow is written in TypeScript under MIT. Plausible has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, GEOInflow 30%. GEOInflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Plausible | GEOInflow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 634 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Elixir | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-27 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 193 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Plausible if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GEOInflow if
- You want the GEOInflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and GEOInflow fits your workflow better
About Plausible
Plausible Analytics Live Demo Open Source Docs Contributing Plausible Analytics is an open source, privacy first web analytics tool. Lightweight, cookie free alternative to Google Analytics. Available in managed cloud or self hosted community edition. 🔐 Privacy focused 🛡️ GDPR, CCPA, PECR compliant 📊 Simple, fast dashboard 🪶 Lightweight script 🇪🇺 Made and hosted in the EU Why Plausible? Here's what makes Plausible a great Google Analytics alternative and why we're trusted by thousands of paying subscribers to deliver their website and business insights: Clutter free Plausible provides simple web analytics…
read the full Plausible overview →
About GEOInflow
GEOInflow English 简体中文 Self hosted web and AI crawler analytics for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). Jointly published by 猎看科技 · 北京日报社智源GEO Quick start · Deployment · AI crawler analytics · Architecture · Documentation · Contributing GEOInflow brings website visitors, AI search referrals, server crawl logs, and content inventories into a shared website context. It helps teams understand which AI crawlers visit their sites, which pages they request, which important pages have no observed crawl activity, where requests fail, and how AI search contributes visitors and conversions. The system includes browser…
read the full GEOInflow overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Plausible or GEOInflow more popular?
Plausible has 29,697 GitHub stars and GEOInflow has 634. Plausible has the larger community by that measure.
Are Plausible and GEOInflow free?
Both are open source. Plausible is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and GEOInflow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Plausible and GEOInflow?
Plausible is written in Elixir and GEOInflow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Plausible or GEOInflow?
Choose Plausible if you want the larger community (29,697 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose GEOInflow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.