head to head · open source

Plausible vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor

Plausible has 29,752 GitHub stars, 1,928 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Plausible leads on adoption by 239% (29,752 vs 8,789 stars). Plausible is written in Elixir under AGPL-3.0; Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT. Plausible has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor 5%. Plausible was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Plausible ★ 30K Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor ★ 8.8K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Plausible Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 8.8K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Elixir Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-07-05
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 464
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Plausible if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Elixir
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Plausible profile →

pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if

  • You want the Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor fits your workflow better

full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor profile →

About Plausible

Plausible Analytics Live Demo Open Source Docs Contributing Plausible Analytics is an open source, privacy first web analytics tool. Lightweight, cookie free alternative to Google Analytics. Available in managed cloud or self hosted community edition. 🔐 Privacy focused 🛡️ GDPR, CCPA, PECR compliant 📊 Simple, fast dashboard 🪶 Lightweight script 🇪🇺 Made and hosted in the EU Why Plausible? Here's what makes Plausible a great Google Analytics alternative and why we're trusted by thousands of paying subscribers to deliver their website and business insights: Clutter free Plausible provides simple web analytics…

read the full Plausible overview →

About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor

🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…

read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Plausible or Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor more popular?

Plausible has 29,752 GitHub stars and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789. Plausible has the larger community by that measure.

Are Plausible and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor free?

Both are open source. Plausible is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Plausible and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor?

Plausible is written in Elixir and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Plausible or Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor?

Choose Plausible if you want the larger community (29,752 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.