head to head · open source
Planka vs paca
Planka has 12,666 GitHub stars, 1,397 forks, 425 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. paca has 2,024 stars, 185 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Planka leads on adoption by 526% (12,666 vs 2,024 stars). Planka is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence; paca is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Planka has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, paca 9%. paca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (project-management, self-hosted, trello-alternative), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Planka | paca | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 13K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 185 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Planka if
- You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick paca if
- You want the paca feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and paca fits your workflow better
About Planka
PLANKA Project mastering driven by fun Install · Demo · Docs · API · Cloud · Pro version PLANKA Pro When the whole team runs on PLANKA. Phones and tablets · five themes · a dashboard across every project · calendar, timeline and map views · cards on more than one board · templates · guest roles · SSO · PDF export. Self hosted exactly as you host it now, supported by the people who build it. Pro upgrades an existing Community installation in place — your database, your volume, your data. It is a real migration rather than a new image: Pro adds a Valkey service and a one off schema promote. The promote accepts…
read the full Planka overview →
About paca
Paca AI native. Free. Lightweight. Open source. The fully customizable alternative to Jira, Trello, ClickUp, and Monday. ✨ Sponsored by Getting Started · MCP Server · Paca Skills · Architecture · Contributing · Roadmap What is Paca? Paca is a self hosted project management platform where AI agents and humans collaborate as equal teammates inside a Scrum team — not as chatbots bolted on the side. Jira gives you a backlog. ClickUp gives you automations. Monday gives you dashboards. Paca gives your AI agents a seat at the table. They join sprint planning, pick up tasks from the board, write BDD specs, and adapt…
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Planka or paca more popular?
Planka has 12,666 GitHub stars and paca has 2,024. Planka has the larger community by that measure.
Are Planka and paca free?
Both are open source. Planka has no licence declared in this registry, and paca is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Planka and paca?
Planka is written in JavaScript and paca in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Planka or paca?
Choose Planka if you want the larger community (12,666 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose paca if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.