head to head · open source
Plane vs mirotalksfu
Plane has 59,546 GitHub stars, 5,776 forks, 1,103 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mirotalksfu has 3,103 stars, 500 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Plane leads on adoption by 1,819% (59,546 vs 3,103 stars). Plane is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; mirotalksfu is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Plane has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, mirotalksfu 16%. mirotalksfu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Plane | mirotalksfu | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 60K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 500 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Plane if
- You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mirotalksfu if
- You want the mirotalksfu feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and mirotalksfu fits your workflow better
About Plane
Plane is an open source project management platform for teams that need to track issues, run cycles, and manage product roadmaps without handing their data to a proprietary SaaS vendor, and it is aimed at engineering, product, and operations teams that would otherwise pay for Jira, Linear, ClickUp, or Asana.
read the full Plane overview →
About mirotalksfu
MiroTalk SFU is a self hosted, open source WebRTC video conferencing platform written in JavaScript and built on the Mediasoup selective forwarding unit architecture. It provides real time communication and collaboration features for rooms, screen sharing, chat, file sharing, live streaming, and recording, while allowing organizations to run the service on their own server. The project positions itself as an alternative to Zoom, Google Meet, Jitsi Meet, and Microsoft Teams.
read the full mirotalksfu overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Plane or mirotalksfu more popular?
Plane has 59,546 GitHub stars and mirotalksfu has 3,103. Plane has the larger community by that measure.
Are Plane and mirotalksfu free?
Both are open source. Plane is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and mirotalksfu under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Plane and mirotalksfu?
Plane is written in TypeScript and mirotalksfu in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Plane or mirotalksfu?
Choose Plane if you want the larger community (59,546 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose mirotalksfu if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.