head to head · open source
pentest-ai vs NeuroSploit
pentest-ai has 1,793 GitHub stars, 328 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NeuroSploit has 1,499 stars, 357 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. pentest-ai leads on adoption by 20% (1,793 vs 1,499 stars). pentest-ai is written in Python under MIT; NeuroSploit is written in Rust under MIT. pentest-ai has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, NeuroSploit 24%. pentest-ai was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai-penetration-testing, ai-security, cybersecurity, ethical-hacking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pentest-ai | NeuroSploit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1.8K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 328 | ⑂ 357 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pentest-ai if
- You weight community size — 1.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NeuroSploit if
- You want the NeuroSploit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and NeuroSploit fits your workflow better
About pentest-ai
Website · Quick start · Verification · Documentation · Issues Pentest AI connects an AI client or model to a penetration testing workflow. It investigates applications, records findings, and uses machine oracles to check whether an exploit can be reproduced . Verified findings carry evidence you can replay. Use it through MCP , from the CLI , or in CI . The model helps drive the investigation; an oracle determines whether a finding earns a verified verdict. Test only systems you own or have explicit authorization to assess. Read the acceptable use policy and terms before running an engagement. Quick start…
read the full pentest-ai overview →
About NeuroSploit
🧠 NeuroSploit v4.4.0 Autonomous, multi model penetration testing harness — Rust, CLI first. by Joas A Santos & Red Team Leaders What is NeuroSploit? NeuroSploit is an autonomous penetration testing tool. You point it at a target; it does the security assessment on its own and hands you a report — recon, exploitation, chaining findings into real impact, and validation, with no human driving each step. The key idea: the harness is the pentester, not the model. Instead of asking one LLM to "hack this", a Rust engine runs the methodology — it picks the right specialist agents for what it finds, runs them in…
read the full NeuroSploit overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pentest-ai or NeuroSploit more popular?
pentest-ai has 1,793 GitHub stars and NeuroSploit has 1,499. pentest-ai has the larger community by that measure.
Are pentest-ai and NeuroSploit free?
Both are open source. pentest-ai is licensed under MIT and NeuroSploit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pentest-ai and NeuroSploit?
pentest-ai is written in Python and NeuroSploit in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pentest-ai or NeuroSploit?
Choose pentest-ai if you want the larger community (1,793 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose NeuroSploit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.