head to head · open source

pentagi vs inql

pentagi has 24,991 GitHub stars, 3,210 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. inql has 1,811 stars, 188 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. pentagi leads on adoption by 1,280% (24,991 vs 1,811 stars). pentagi is written in Go under MIT; inql is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. pentagi has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, inql 10%. pentagi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (graphql, penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pentagi ★ 25K inql ★ 1.8K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pentagi inql
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 1.8K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 188
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pentagi if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pentagi profile →

pick inql if

  • You want the inql feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and inql fits your workflow better

full inql profile →

About pentagi

PentAGI is an MIT licensed, self hosted multi agent system written in Go that runs fully autonomous AI agents to perform complex penetration testing tasks inside an isolated Docker sandbox, built for information security professionals, researchers, and enthusiasts.

read the full pentagi overview →

About inql

InQL is an open source Burp Suite extension for advanced GraphQL testing, built by Doyensec for penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security teams who need to analyse GraphQL endpoints from inside the Burp proxy they already use.

read the full inql overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

pentagi vs PayloadsAllTheThings pentagi vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills pentagi vs ProjectDiscovery pentagi vs PentestGPT pentagi vs crowdsec pentagi vs Osintgram pentagi vs thc-hydra pentagi vs vuls pentagi vs osv-scanner pentagi vs rengine pentagi vs reconftw pentagi vs cve

Frequently asked questions

Is pentagi or inql more popular?

pentagi has 24,991 GitHub stars and inql has 1,811. pentagi has the larger community by that measure.

Are pentagi and inql free?

Both are open source. pentagi is licensed under MIT and inql under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pentagi and inql?

pentagi is written in Go and inql in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pentagi or inql?

Choose pentagi if you want the larger community (24,991 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose inql if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.