head to head · open source

pentagi vs vuls

pentagi has 24,708 GitHub stars, 3,177 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. vuls has 12,263 stars, 1,243 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pentagi leads on adoption by 101% (24,708 vs 12,263 stars). pentagi is written in Go under MIT; vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0. pentagi has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, vuls 10%. vuls was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (golang, security-automation, security-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pentagi ★ 25K vuls ★ 12K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

pentagi vuls
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 12K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pentagi if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pentagi profile →

pick vuls if

  • You want the vuls feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and vuls fits your workflow better

full vuls profile →

About pentagi

PentAGI is an MIT licensed, self hosted multi agent system written in Go that runs fully autonomous AI agents to perform complex penetration testing tasks inside an isolated Docker sandbox, built for information security professionals, researchers, and enthusiasts.

read the full pentagi overview →

About vuls

Vuls is an agent less vulnerability scanner written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, aimed at system administrators and security teams that must find and track known vulnerabilities across Linux, FreeBSD, Windows and macOS hosts, containers, WordPress installs, programming language libraries and network devices without installing an agent on every machine.

read the full vuls overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

pentagi vs PayloadsAllTheThings pentagi vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills pentagi vs ProjectDiscovery pentagi vs osv-scanner pentagi vs Nettacker pentagi vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool pentagi vs afrog pentagi vs Tracecat pentagi vs airgorah pentagi vs tenzir

Frequently asked questions

Is pentagi or vuls more popular?

pentagi has 24,708 GitHub stars and vuls has 12,263. pentagi has the larger community by that measure.

Are pentagi and vuls free?

Both are open source. pentagi is licensed under MIT and vuls under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pentagi and vuls?

pentagi is written in Go and vuls in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pentagi or vuls?

Choose pentagi if you want the larger community (24,708 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose vuls if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.