head to head · open source

NocoBase vs penguin-harness

NocoBase has 24,294 GitHub stars, 2,879 forks, 307 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. penguin-harness has 2,305 stars, 245 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoBase leads on adoption by 954% (24,294 vs 2,305 stars). NocoBase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; penguin-harness is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. NocoBase has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, penguin-harness 11%. penguin-harness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoBase ★ 24K penguin-harness ★ 2.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoBase penguin-harness
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 2.3K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 245
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoBase if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoBase profile →

pick penguin-harness if

  • You want the penguin-harness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and penguin-harness fits your workflow better

full penguin-harness profile →

About NocoBase

NocoBase is an open source AI plus no code platform, written in TypeScript, for teams and non developers who need to build and run internal business systems such as admin dashboards, CRM, and ERP tooling.

read the full NocoBase overview →

About penguin-harness

PenguinHarness is an open source, local first, multi agent auto development platform that runs on a developer's own computer or server and automates the full lifecycle of AI agent applications — creation, evaluation, optimization, and deployment — under the Apache 2.0 licence.

read the full penguin-harness overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

NocoBase vs vite NocoBase vs webpack NocoBase vs Appwrite NocoBase vs parcel NocoBase vs esbuild NocoBase vs Harness NocoBase vs Dokku NocoBase vs turborepo NocoBase vs nx NocoBase vs gradle NocoBase vs rspack NocoBase vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoBase or penguin-harness more popular?

NocoBase has 24,294 GitHub stars and penguin-harness has 2,305. NocoBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoBase and penguin-harness free?

Both are open source. NocoBase has no licence declared in this registry, and penguin-harness is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoBase and penguin-harness?

NocoBase is written in TypeScript and penguin-harness in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoBase or penguin-harness?

Choose NocoBase if you want the larger community (24,294 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose penguin-harness if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.