head to head · open source
Pearcleaner vs parallel-disk-usage
Pearcleaner has 15,064 GitHub stars, 402 forks, 84 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. parallel-disk-usage has 741 stars, 26 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Pearcleaner leads on adoption by 1,933% (15,064 vs 741 stars). Pearcleaner is written in Swift under a custom or non-standard licence; parallel-disk-usage is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Pearcleaner has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, parallel-disk-usage 4%. parallel-disk-usage was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Pearcleaner | parallel-disk-usage | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 741 |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Swift | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-06-22 | 2026-09-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 402 | ⑂ 26 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Pearcleaner if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Swift
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick parallel-disk-usage if
- You want the parallel-disk-usage feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and parallel-disk-usage fits your workflow better
About Pearcleaner
Pearcleaner Website The only legitimate website owned by me is Anything else offering Pearcleaner downloads is either a scam or not affiliated with me. More details HERE. Project Status: On Hold As you may have noticed, development on the app has basically stopped since end of 2025, so I wanted to provide some context. Between a new job, joining a friend who is building a SaaS company, and other life priorities, I no longer have the time needed to actively maintain or continue development on the project. Another major reason is that I previously relied on my work MacBook for development. After changing jobs, I…
read the full Pearcleaner overview →
About parallel-disk-usage
Parallel Disk Usage (pdu) Highly parallelized, blazing fast directory tree analyzer. Description pdu is a CLI program that renders a graphical chart for disk usages of files and directories, it is an alternative to dust and dutree . Benchmark The benchmark was generated by a GitHub Workflow and uploaded to the release page. Programs pdu v0.20.0 dust v1.2.1 dua v2.30.1 ncdu gdu v5.31.0 du benchmark results (lower is better) (See more) Demo Features Very fast. Relative comparison of separate files. Extensible via the library crate or JSON interface. Unbiased regarding hardlinks: All hardlinks are treated as…
read the full parallel-disk-usage overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More System Cleanup & Optimization projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Pearcleaner or parallel-disk-usage more popular?
Pearcleaner has 15,064 GitHub stars and parallel-disk-usage has 741. Pearcleaner has the larger community by that measure.
Are Pearcleaner and parallel-disk-usage free?
Both are open source. Pearcleaner has no licence declared in this registry, and parallel-disk-usage is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Pearcleaner and parallel-disk-usage?
Pearcleaner is written in Swift and parallel-disk-usage in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Pearcleaner or parallel-disk-usage?
Choose Pearcleaner if you want the larger community (15,064 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose parallel-disk-usage if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.