head to head · open source

Part-DB-server vs guac

Part-DB-server has 1,768 GitHub stars, 235 forks, 209 open issues and last shipped yesterday. guac has 1,541 stars, 215 forks, 89 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Part-DB-server leads on adoption by 15% (1,768 vs 1,541 stars). Part-DB-server is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0; guac is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Part-DB-server has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, guac 14%. Part-DB-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Part-DB-server ★ 1.8K guac ★ 1.5K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Part-DB-server guac
GitHub stars ★ 1.8K ★ 1.5K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in PHP Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 235 ⑂ 215
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Part-DB-server if

  • You weight community size — 1.8K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Part-DB-server profile →

pick guac if

  • You want the guac feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and guac fits your workflow better

full guac profile →

About Part-DB-server

Part DB is an open source inventory management system for electronic components. It is a PHP and Symfony web application installed on a web server, so users access it through a browser without extra client software. The repository calls this version a complete rewrite of the legacy Part DB project, and it is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Part-DB-server overview →

About guac

GUAC is an OpenSSF incubating project under the Supply Chain Integrity WG that aggregates software security metadata into a high fidelity graph database. It is written in Go, released under Apache 2.0, and positioned in the software supply chain security ecosystem as the aggregation and synthesis layer of the supply chain transparency model.

read the full guac overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More ERP & Operations projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the ERP & Operations field.

Part-DB-server vs Odoo Part-DB-server vs grocy Part-DB-server vs GreaterWMS Part-DB-server vs Shelf Part-DB-server vs ralph Part-DB-server vs Open Mercato Part-DB-server vs steedos-platform Part-DB-server vs craftplan Part-DB-server vs tego Part-DB-server vs cdxgen Part-DB-server vs rebuild Part-DB-server vs totum-mit

Frequently asked questions

Is Part-DB-server or guac more popular?

Part-DB-server has 1,768 GitHub stars and guac has 1,541. Part-DB-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are Part-DB-server and guac free?

Both are open source. Part-DB-server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and guac under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Part-DB-server and guac?

Part-DB-server is written in PHP and guac in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Part-DB-server or guac?

Choose Part-DB-server if you want the larger community (1,768 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose guac if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.