head to head · open source

Part-DB-server vs cdxgen

Part-DB-server has 1,768 GitHub stars, 235 forks, 209 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cdxgen has 1,074 stars, 261 forks, 420 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Part-DB-server leads on adoption by 65% (1,768 vs 1,074 stars). Part-DB-server is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0; cdxgen is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Part-DB-server has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, cdxgen 24%. cdxgen was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Part-DB-server ★ 1.8K cdxgen ★ 1.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Part-DB-server cdxgen
GitHub stars ★ 1.8K ★ 1.1K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in PHP JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 235 ⑂ 261
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Part-DB-server if

  • You weight community size — 1.8K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Part-DB-server profile →

pick cdxgen if

  • You want the cdxgen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and cdxgen fits your workflow better

full cdxgen profile →

About Part-DB-server

Part DB is an open source inventory management system for electronic components. It is a PHP and Symfony web application installed on a web server, so users access it through a browser without extra client software. The repository calls this version a complete rewrite of the legacy Part DB project, and it is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Part-DB-server overview →

About cdxgen

cdxgen is a CLI tool, library, REPL, and server that creates, validates, signs, and verifies CycloneDX Bill of Materials documents from source code and container images, and it is aimed at developers, AppSec engineers, compliance teams, and platform teams that need machine readable BOMs inside a CI/CD pipeline.

read the full cdxgen overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More ERP & Operations projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the ERP & Operations field.

Part-DB-server vs Odoo Part-DB-server vs grocy Part-DB-server vs GreaterWMS Part-DB-server vs Shelf Part-DB-server vs ralph Part-DB-server vs Open Mercato Part-DB-server vs steedos-platform Part-DB-server vs guac Part-DB-server vs craftplan Part-DB-server vs tego Part-DB-server vs rebuild Part-DB-server vs totum-mit

Frequently asked questions

Is Part-DB-server or cdxgen more popular?

Part-DB-server has 1,768 GitHub stars and cdxgen has 1,074. Part-DB-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are Part-DB-server and cdxgen free?

Both are open source. Part-DB-server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and cdxgen under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Part-DB-server and cdxgen?

Part-DB-server is written in PHP and cdxgen in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Part-DB-server or cdxgen?

Choose Part-DB-server if you want the larger community (1,768 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cdxgen if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.