head to head · open source

parse-server vs storage

parse-server has 21,405 GitHub stars, 4,808 forks, 561 open issues and last shipped yesterday. storage has 1,327 stars, 308 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. parse-server leads on adoption by 1,513% (21,405 vs 1,327 stars). parse-server is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; storage is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. parse-server has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, storage 23%. parse-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

parse-server ★ 21K storage ★ 1.3K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

parse-server storage
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-26 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 308
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick parse-server if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full parse-server profile →

pick storage if

  • You want the storage feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and storage fits your workflow better

full storage profile →

About parse-server

Parse Server is an open source backend, built for Node.js and the Express web application framework, that can be deployed to any infrastructure able to run Node.js and that serves applications written against the Parse Platform.

read the full parse-server overview →

About storage

Supabase Storage is a lightweight, S3 compatible object storage service written in TypeScript that keeps its metadata in Postgres, and it is built for teams that want object storage whose access rules are expressed as database policies rather than as a separate permission layer.

read the full storage overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

parse-server vs ClickHouse parse-server vs seaweedfs parse-server vs rustfs parse-server vs Apache Pinot parse-server vs dlt parse-server vs mountpoint-s3 parse-server vs cubefs parse-server vs lakeFS parse-server vs ZeroFS parse-server vs versitygw parse-server vs cloudserver parse-server vs aistore

Frequently asked questions

Is parse-server or storage more popular?

parse-server has 21,405 GitHub stars and storage has 1,327. parse-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are parse-server and storage free?

Both are open source. parse-server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and storage under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between parse-server and storage?

parse-server is written in JavaScript and storage in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, parse-server or storage?

Choose parse-server if you want the larger community (21,405 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose storage if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.