head to head · open source

parse-server vs lakeFS

parse-server has 21,410 GitHub stars, 4,806 forks, 561 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. lakeFS has 5,535 stars, 477 forks, 443 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. parse-server leads on adoption by 287% (21,410 vs 5,535 stars). parse-server is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; lakeFS is written in Go under Apache-2.0. parse-server has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, lakeFS 9%. lakeFS was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

parse-server ★ 21K lakeFS ★ 5.5K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

parse-server lakeFS
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 5.5K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 477
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick parse-server if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full parse-server profile →

pick lakeFS if

  • You want the lakeFS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and lakeFS fits your workflow better

full lakeFS profile →

About parse-server

Parse Server is an open source backend, built for Node.js and the Express web application framework, that can be deployed to any infrastructure able to run Node.js and that serves applications written against the Parse Platform.

read the full parse-server overview →

About lakeFS

lakeFS is an open source data version control tool — commonly described as Git for data — that turns object storage into a versioned, Git like repository, and it is built for data engineers, analytics engineers, and data scientists who need repeatable, atomic, and auditable data lake operations.

read the full lakeFS overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 83K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

parse-server vs ClickHouse parse-server vs seaweedfs parse-server vs rustfs parse-server vs Apache Pinot parse-server vs dlt parse-server vs mountpoint-s3 parse-server vs cubefs parse-server vs hue parse-server vs bigquery-utils parse-server vs bigfunctions parse-server vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is parse-server or lakeFS more popular?

parse-server has 21,410 GitHub stars and lakeFS has 5,535. parse-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are parse-server and lakeFS free?

Both are open source. parse-server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lakeFS under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between parse-server and lakeFS?

parse-server is written in JavaScript and lakeFS in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, parse-server or lakeFS?

Choose parse-server if you want the larger community (21,410 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lakeFS if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.