head to head · open source
parcel vs Woodpecker CI
parcel has 44,025 GitHub stars, 2,284 forks, 606 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. Woodpecker CI has 7,886 stars, 679 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. parcel leads on adoption by 458% (44,025 vs 7,886 stars). parcel is written in JavaScript under MIT; Woodpecker CI is written in Go under Apache-2.0. parcel has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Woodpecker CI 9%. Woodpecker CI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| parcel | Woodpecker CI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 44K | ★ 7.9K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 679 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick parcel if
- You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Woodpecker CI if
- You want the Woodpecker CI feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Woodpecker CI fits your workflow better
About parcel
Parcel is a zero configuration build tool for the web, distributed as the parcel package on npm and licensed under MIT. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem and is written primarily in JavaScript, with its JavaScript compiler implemented in Rust for native performance. The project has been developed for roughly nine years, carries more than 44,000 stars and over 2,200 forks on GitHub, and its documentation is hosted at parceljs.org.
read the full parcel overview →
About Woodpecker CI
Woodpecker CI is a continuous integration and continuous delivery engine written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the developer tooling ecosystem around build and deployment automation, and it is distributed as a self hostable server plus one or more agents that execute pipeline work. The project describes itself as a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility, and it is catalogued under topics such as automation, ci, cicd, devops, docker, and kubernetes. Its documentation and plugin directory are hosted at woodpecker ci.org.
read the full Woodpecker CI overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is parcel or Woodpecker CI more popular?
parcel has 44,025 GitHub stars and Woodpecker CI has 7,886. parcel has the larger community by that measure.
Are parcel and Woodpecker CI free?
Both are open source. parcel is licensed under MIT and Woodpecker CI under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between parcel and Woodpecker CI?
parcel is written in JavaScript and Woodpecker CI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, parcel or Woodpecker CI?
Choose parcel if you want the larger community (44,025 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Woodpecker CI if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.