head to head · open source

PyMuPDF vs papermill

PyMuPDF has 10,744 GitHub stars, 800 forks, 58 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. papermill has 6,485 stars, 462 forks, 196 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. PyMuPDF leads on adoption by 66% (10,744 vs 6,485 stars). PyMuPDF is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; papermill is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. PyMuPDF has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, papermill 7%. PyMuPDF was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PyMuPDF ★ 11K papermill ★ 6.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PyMuPDF papermill
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 6.5K
License AGPL-3.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-06
Forks ⑂ 800 ⑂ 462
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PyMuPDF if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PyMuPDF profile →

pick papermill if

  • You want the papermill feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and papermill fits your workflow better

full papermill profile →

About PyMuPDF

PyMuPDF is a high performance Python library, built on the MuPDF C engine, for extracting, analysing, converting, rendering and manipulating PDF and other documents, aimed at Python developers building data extraction, document processing and AI retrieval pipelines.

read the full PyMuPDF overview →

About papermill

Papermill is a Python tool published under the BSD 3 Clause licence by the nteract project that parameterizes, executes, and analyzes Jupyter notebooks, and it is aimed at teams who need to run the same notebook repeatedly with different inputs inside data pipelines.

read the full papermill overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

vite vs lerna lerna vs turborepo lerna vs koreader lerna vs nx lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest koreader vs koodo-reader react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

PyMuPDF vs lerna PyMuPDF vs koreader PyMuPDF vs koodo-reader PyMuPDF vs calibre PyMuPDF vs readest PyMuPDF vs ebook2audiobook PyMuPDF vs calibre-web PyMuPDF vs LibreTranslate PyMuPDF vs so-novel PyMuPDF vs Calibre-Web-Automated PyMuPDF vs Weblate PyMuPDF vs Lingo.dev

Frequently asked questions

Is PyMuPDF or papermill more popular?

PyMuPDF has 10,744 GitHub stars and papermill has 6,485. PyMuPDF has the larger community by that measure.

Are PyMuPDF and papermill free?

Both are open source. PyMuPDF is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and papermill under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PyMuPDF and papermill?

PyMuPDF is written in Python and papermill in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PyMuPDF or papermill?

Choose PyMuPDF if you want the larger community (10,744 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose papermill if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.