head to head · open source

PyMuPDF vs Lingo.dev

PyMuPDF has 10,744 GitHub stars, 800 forks, 58 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Lingo.dev has 5,404 stars, 811 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. PyMuPDF leads on adoption by 99% (10,744 vs 5,404 stars). PyMuPDF is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; Lingo.dev is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. PyMuPDF has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Lingo.dev 15%. PyMuPDF was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PyMuPDF ★ 11K Lingo.dev ★ 5.4K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PyMuPDF Lingo.dev
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 5.4K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 800 ⑂ 811
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PyMuPDF if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PyMuPDF profile →

pick Lingo.dev if

  • You want the Lingo.dev feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Lingo.dev fits your workflow better

full Lingo.dev profile →

About PyMuPDF

PyMuPDF is a high performance Python library, built on the MuPDF C engine, for extracting, analysing, converting, rendering and manipulating PDF and other documents, aimed at Python developers building data extraction, document processing and AI retrieval pipelines.

read the full PyMuPDF overview →

About Lingo.dev

Lingo.dev is an open source suite of localization engineering tools that connects codebases and commits to translation APIs, built for developers and teams maintaining multilingual JavaScript, React, React Native, and TypeScript applications.

read the full Lingo.dev overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

vite vs lerna lerna vs turborepo lerna vs koreader lerna vs nx lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest koreader vs koodo-reader react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

PyMuPDF vs lerna PyMuPDF vs koreader PyMuPDF vs koodo-reader PyMuPDF vs calibre PyMuPDF vs readest PyMuPDF vs ebook2audiobook PyMuPDF vs calibre-web PyMuPDF vs LibreTranslate PyMuPDF vs so-novel PyMuPDF vs papermill PyMuPDF vs Calibre-Web-Automated PyMuPDF vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is PyMuPDF or Lingo.dev more popular?

PyMuPDF has 10,744 GitHub stars and Lingo.dev has 5,404. PyMuPDF has the larger community by that measure.

Are PyMuPDF and Lingo.dev free?

Both are open source. PyMuPDF is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Lingo.dev under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PyMuPDF and Lingo.dev?

PyMuPDF is written in Python and Lingo.dev in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PyMuPDF or Lingo.dev?

Choose PyMuPDF if you want the larger community (10,744 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Lingo.dev if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.