head to head · open source
PandaWiki vs simba
PandaWiki has 10,273 GitHub stars, 1,024 forks, 324 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. simba has 1,541 stars, 114 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. PandaWiki leads on adoption by 567% (10,273 vs 1,541 stars). PandaWiki is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; simba is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. PandaWiki has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, simba 7%. PandaWiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PandaWiki | simba | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 10K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 114 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PandaWiki if
- You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick simba if
- You want the simba feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and simba fits your workflow better
About PandaWiki
PandaWiki is an open source knowledge base system driven by large language models, written in TypeScript and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It lives in the self hosted documentation and knowledge base ecosystem, alongside the AI and LLM tooling that powers its features. The project is designed to build intelligent product documentation, technical documentation, FAQ pages, and blog systems, and it ships as a self hosted application that runs on a Linux server through Docker. Its topic list places it squarely in the ai, docs, documentation, kb, llm, self hosted, and wiki space, and the repository has accumula…
read the full PandaWiki overview →
About simba
Simba is an open source, self hosted customer service assistant built for teams that need full control over the AI answering questions from their own knowledge base, with evaluation and monitoring designed in rather than bolted on.
read the full simba overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PandaWiki or simba more popular?
PandaWiki has 10,273 GitHub stars and simba has 1,541. PandaWiki has the larger community by that measure.
Are PandaWiki and simba free?
Both are open source. PandaWiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and simba under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between PandaWiki and simba?
PandaWiki is written in TypeScript and simba in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PandaWiki or simba?
Choose PandaWiki if you want the larger community (10,273 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose simba if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.