head to head · open source

PandaWiki vs open-knowledge

PandaWiki has 10,458 GitHub stars, 1,042 forks, 324 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. open-knowledge has 4,781 stars, 327 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. PandaWiki leads on adoption by 119% (10,458 vs 4,781 stars). PandaWiki is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; open-knowledge is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. PandaWiki has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, open-knowledge 7%. open-knowledge was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docs, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PandaWiki ★ 10K open-knowledge ★ 4.8K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PandaWiki open-knowledge
GitHub stars ★ 10K ★ 4.8K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-21 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 327
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PandaWiki if

  • You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PandaWiki profile →

pick open-knowledge if

  • You want the open-knowledge feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-knowledge fits your workflow better

full open-knowledge profile →

About PandaWiki

📖 官方网站 🙋‍♂️ 微信交流群 👋 项目介绍 PandaWiki 是一款 AI 大模型驱动的 开源知识库搭建系统 ,帮助你快速构建智能化的 产品文档、技术文档、FAQ、博客系统 ,借助大模型的力量为你提供 AI 创作、AI 问答、AI 搜索 等能力。 ⚡️ 界面展示 🔥 功能与特色 AI 驱动智能化:AI 辅助创作、AI 辅助问答、AI 辅助搜索。 强大的富文本编辑能力:兼容 Markdown 和 HTML,支持导出为 word、pdf、markdown 等多种格式。 轻松与第三方应用进行集成:支持做成网页挂件挂在其他网站上,支持做成钉钉、飞书、企业微信等聊天机器人。 通过第三方来源导入内容:根据网页 URL 导入、通过网站 Sitemap 导入、通过 RSS 订阅、通过离线文件导入等。 🚀 上手指南 安装 PandaWiki 你需要一台支持 Docker 20.x 以上版本的 Linux 系统来安装 PandaWiki。 使用 root 权限登录你的服务器,然后执行以下命令。 根据命令提示的选项进行安装,命令执行过程将会持续几分钟,请耐心等待。 关于安装与部署的更多细节请参考 安装 PandaWiki。 登录 PandaWiki 在上一步中,安装命令执行结束后,你的终端会输出以下内容。 使用浏览器打开上述内容中的 “访问地址”,你将看到 PandaWiki 的控制台登录入口,使用上述内容中的 “用户名”…

read the full PandaWiki overview →

About open-knowledge

OpenKnowledge is a beautiful markdown editor with integrations with Claude, Codex, and other harnesses. For knowledge bases, LLM wikis, specs, and notes. Private, local, and free. website • desktop app • web UI + cli • 𝕏 • discord Features Highlights: Full true WYSIWYG so that editing markdown files feels like editing a Google Doc or Notion page. Desktop app (macOS, Windows, Linux) and web UI with file navigator, search, tabs, graph wiki link viewer, and more. Integrated side by side AI editing with Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Pi and others . Can be used with any harness/agent via MCP/CLI. Out of the box MCP…

read the full open-knowledge overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

Frequently asked questions

Is PandaWiki or open-knowledge more popular?

PandaWiki has 10,458 GitHub stars and open-knowledge has 4,781. PandaWiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are PandaWiki and open-knowledge free?

Both are open source. PandaWiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and open-knowledge under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PandaWiki and open-knowledge?

PandaWiki is written in TypeScript and open-knowledge in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PandaWiki or open-knowledge?

Choose PandaWiki if you want the larger community (10,458 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-knowledge if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.