head to head · open source

actions-gh-pages vs Pagecord

actions-gh-pages has 5,362 GitHub stars, 450 forks, 95 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Pagecord has 190 stars, 15 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. actions-gh-pages leads on adoption by 2,722% (5,362 vs 190 stars). actions-gh-pages is written in TypeScript under MIT; Pagecord is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence. actions-gh-pages has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Pagecord 8%. Pagecord was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

actions-gh-pages ★ 5.4K Pagecord ★ 190 category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

actions-gh-pages Pagecord
GitHub stars ★ 5.4K ★ 190
License MIT Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 450 ⑂ 15
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick actions-gh-pages if

  • You weight community size — 5.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full actions-gh-pages profile →

pick Pagecord if

  • You want the Pagecord feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and Pagecord fits your workflow better

full Pagecord profile →

About actions-gh-pages

This project is a GitHub Action that deploys static files to GitHub Pages. It lives in the GitHub Actions ecosystem, is written in TypeScript, and is distributed under the MIT license. The action takes a build output directory from a workflow and publishes its contents to a branch that GitHub Pages serves, so a repository can go from committed source to a live site without any manual upload step. It is designed to pair with static site generators rather than to replace them, and the topic list names Hugo, MkDocs, Gatsby, mdBook, Next, Nuxt, and VuePress among the tools it is used alongside.

read the full actions-gh-pages overview →

About Pagecord

Pagecord is a personal website and blogging platform built on Ruby on Rails that is aimed at people who want to run their own blog, either through the hosted service at pagecord.com or from their own machine, and who would rather write than fight a publishing pipeline.

read the full Pagecord overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Blogging & Personal Sites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.

actions-gh-pages vs next.js actions-gh-pages vs nuxt actions-gh-pages vs gatsby actions-gh-pages vs Ghost actions-gh-pages vs jekyll actions-gh-pages vs hexo actions-gh-pages vs nextra actions-gh-pages vs kit actions-gh-pages vs vike actions-gh-pages vs react-snap actions-gh-pages vs hugo-theme-academic-cv actions-gh-pages vs docfx

Frequently asked questions

Is actions-gh-pages or Pagecord more popular?

actions-gh-pages has 5,362 GitHub stars and Pagecord has 190. actions-gh-pages has the larger community by that measure.

Are actions-gh-pages and Pagecord free?

Both are open source. actions-gh-pages is licensed under MIT, and Pagecord has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between actions-gh-pages and Pagecord?

actions-gh-pages is written in TypeScript and Pagecord in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, actions-gh-pages or Pagecord?

Choose actions-gh-pages if you want the larger community (5,362 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pagecord if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.