head to head · open source

Lightpanda vs CloakBrowser

Lightpanda has 35,452 GitHub stars, 1,684 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped today. CloakBrowser has 31,578 stars, 2,615 forks, 227 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 12% (35,452 vs 31,578 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, CloakBrowser 8%. Lightpanda was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Lightpanda ★ 35K CloakBrowser ★ 32K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Lightpanda CloakBrowser
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 32K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Zig Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 2.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Lightpanda if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Zig
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Lightpanda profile →

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You want the CloakBrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and CloakBrowser fits your workflow better

full CloakBrowser profile →

About Lightpanda

Lightpanda is a headless browser built from scratch in Zig, designed specifically for AI agents and automation tasks. It is not a fork of Chromium or WebKit but a new implementation targeting performance and efficiency in automated web interactions. It lives in the browser automation ecosystem, competing with tools like Puppeteer and Playwright that typically rely on Chromium based headless modes.

read the full Lightpanda overview →

About CloakBrowser

CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Lightpanda vs Browser Use Lightpanda vs Crawl4AI Lightpanda vs Scrapling Lightpanda vs scrapy Lightpanda vs EasySpider Lightpanda vs changedetection.io Lightpanda vs lux Lightpanda vs Scrapegraph-ai Lightpanda vs crawlee Lightpanda vs colly Lightpanda vs stagehand Lightpanda vs proxy_pool

Frequently asked questions

Is Lightpanda or CloakBrowser more popular?

Lightpanda has 35,452 GitHub stars and CloakBrowser has 31,578. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.

Are Lightpanda and CloakBrowser free?

Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and CloakBrowser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Lightpanda and CloakBrowser?

Lightpanda is written in Zig and CloakBrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Lightpanda or CloakBrowser?

Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (35,452 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose CloakBrowser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.