head to head · open source
Osintgram vs emba
Osintgram has 15,421 GitHub stars, 3,253 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. emba has 3,751 stars, 344 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Osintgram leads on adoption by 311% (15,421 vs 3,751 stars). Osintgram is written in Python under GPL-3.0; emba is written in Shell under GPL-3.0. Osintgram has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, emba 9%. emba was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (hacking, penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Osintgram | emba | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 344 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Osintgram if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick emba if
- You want the emba feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and emba fits your workflow better
About Osintgram
Osintgram 🔎📸 Point it at an Instagram account and find out who's behind it. Osintgram collects, cross references and lays out everything a public profile gives away — followers, captions, hashtags, geotagged locations, posting habits, public contact details — in a web interface you run on your own machine. Ask in plain language and a local AI model figures out which lookups to run. Or don't: pick the commands yourself and skip the model entirely. Why you might like it It answers questions, not just commands. "How many followers do they have and which hashtags do they use most?" runs three lookups and comes…
read the full Osintgram overview →
About emba
EMBA The security analyzer for firmware of embedded devices EMBA is designed as the central firmware analysis and SBOM tool for penetration testers, product security teams, developers and responsible product managers. It supports the complete security analysis process starting with firmware extraction , doing static analysis and dynamic analysis via emulation, building the SBOM and finally generating a web based vulnerability report. EMBA automatically discovers possible weak spots and vulnerabilities in firmware. Examples are insecure binaries, old and outdated software components, potentially vulnerable…
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Osintgram or emba more popular?
Osintgram has 15,421 GitHub stars and emba has 3,751. Osintgram has the larger community by that measure.
Are Osintgram and emba free?
Both are open source. Osintgram is licensed under GPL-3.0 and emba under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Osintgram and emba?
Osintgram is written in Python and emba in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Osintgram or emba?
Choose Osintgram if you want the larger community (15,421 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose emba if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.