head to head · open source

srs vs openvidu

srs has 29,262 GitHub stars, 5,693 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped today. openvidu has 2,129 stars, 477 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. srs leads on adoption by 1,274% (29,262 vs 2,129 stars). srs is written in C++ under MIT; openvidu is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. srs has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, openvidu 22%. srs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

srs ★ 29K openvidu ★ 2.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

srs openvidu
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 2.1K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 477
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick srs if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full srs profile →

pick openvidu if

  • You want the openvidu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and openvidu fits your workflow better

full openvidu profile →

About srs

SRS (Simple Realtime Server) is an open source, AI driven real time media server written in C++ and released under the MIT license. It ingests and republishes live audio and video across a broad set of streaming protocols, including RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP FLV, HTTP TS, SRT, MPEG DASH, and GB28181. The project runs on Linux and macOS and is built for x86 64, ARMv7, AArch64, Apple M1, RISC V, LoongArch, and MIPS architectures. Codec support covers H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9, AAC, Opus, and G.711. The current line is SRS 8.0, and the project has been developed for roughly eleven years, with documentation published in b…

read the full srs overview →

About openvidu

OpenVidu is an open source platform for building real time video and audio applications. It lives in the TypeScript, WebRTC, and collaboration software ecosystem, and it is built on LiveKit and mediasoup. The project gives teams a self hosted base for video conferencing, rooms, chat, and media workflows under an Apache 2.0 license.

read the full openvidu overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs srs plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

srs vs Plane srs vs Rocket.Chat srs vs cobalt srs vs Buzz srs vs Jitsi srs vs Huly srs vs Zulip srs vs etherpad srs vs drawnix srs vs univer srs vs chat srs vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is srs or openvidu more popular?

srs has 29,262 GitHub stars and openvidu has 2,129. srs has the larger community by that measure.

Are srs and openvidu free?

Both are open source. srs is licensed under MIT and openvidu under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between srs and openvidu?

srs is written in C++ and openvidu in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, srs or openvidu?

Choose srs if you want the larger community (29,262 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openvidu if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.