head to head · open source
openhuman vs wisp-science
openhuman has 42,503 GitHub stars, 4,209 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wisp-science has 1,062 stars, 108 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openhuman leads on adoption by 3,902% (42,503 vs 1,062 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; wisp-science is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, wisp-science 10%. openhuman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (local-first, rust), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| openhuman | wisp-science | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 108 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick openhuman if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wisp-science if
- You want the wisp-science feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and wisp-science fits your workflow better
About openhuman
OpenHuman OpenHuman is your personal AI super intelligence: a brain that remembers everything, a fantastic orchestrator, a deep researcher. Local first, simple, powerful. Discussions • Discord • Reddit • X/Twitter • Docs • Follow @senamakel (Creator) 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇵🇰 اردو Early Beta : Under active development. Expect rough edges. OpenHuman is not AGI. But it is a meaningful architectural step closer, with better memory, better orchestration, and better tooling. 🎉 Within one week of launch, OpenHuman became the number one trending repository on GitHub for nine days in a…
read the full openhuman overview →
About wisp-science
Wisp Science The open source, local first AI research workbench. WISP — Workspace for Intelligent Scientific Practice English · 简体中文 · Website · Releases Search the literature, run Python and R, query 80 scientific databases, and keep the trail — figures, runs, decisions, and drafts — in one project. Your data, conversations, and credentials stay on your machines. Bring your own model. Keep your science. What you can do An agent that does the work Bring OpenAI compatible or Anthropic models, or drive Codex / Claude Code over ACP. The agent reads and writes project files, runs shell, and loads reusable Skills (…
read the full wisp-science overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is openhuman or wisp-science more popular?
openhuman has 42,503 GitHub stars and wisp-science has 1,062. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.
Are openhuman and wisp-science free?
Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and wisp-science under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between openhuman and wisp-science?
openhuman is written in Rust and wisp-science in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, openhuman or wisp-science?
Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (42,503 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose wisp-science if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.