head to head · open source

openhuman vs invisible_dots

openhuman has 41,614 GitHub stars, 4,097 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped today. invisible_dots has 31,817 stars, 4,695 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. openhuman leads on adoption by 31% (41,614 vs 31,817 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; invisible_dots is written in TypeScript under MIT. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, invisible_dots 15%. invisible_dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openhuman ★ 42K invisible_dots ★ 32K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openhuman invisible_dots
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 32K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 4.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openhuman if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openhuman profile →

pick invisible_dots if

  • You want the invisible_dots feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and invisible_dots fits your workflow better

full invisible_dots profile →

About openhuman

OpenHuman is an open source, GPL 3.0 licensed agent harness written in Rust and shipped as a Tauri desktop application, aimed at individuals who want a personal AI assistant whose memory, orchestration, and research tooling run local first on their own machine.

read the full openhuman overview →

About invisible_dots

invisible dots is an open source, self hosted alternative to OpenAI Dots and Grok Bot that gives you your own AI agent running on a private, hardware virtualised computer with an anti detect browser.

read the full invisible_dots overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 392K Hermes Agent ★ 252K Ollama ★ 183K Dify ★ 158K ponytail ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

openhuman vs OpenClaw openhuman vs Hermes Agent openhuman vs Open WebUI openhuman vs ComfyUI openhuman vs odysseus openhuman vs LobeChat openhuman vs AnythingLLM openhuman vs Cherry Studio openhuman vs nanobot openhuman vs LibreChat openhuman vs Jan openhuman vs chatbox

Frequently asked questions

Is openhuman or invisible_dots more popular?

openhuman has 41,614 GitHub stars and invisible_dots has 31,817. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.

Are openhuman and invisible_dots free?

Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and invisible_dots under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openhuman and invisible_dots?

openhuman is written in Rust and invisible_dots in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openhuman or invisible_dots?

Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (41,614 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose invisible_dots if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.