head to head · open source

openagent vs llm-wiki-compiler

openagent has 5,735 GitHub stars, 673 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. llm-wiki-compiler has 2,235 stars, 238 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. openagent leads on adoption by 157% (5,735 vs 2,235 stars). openagent is written in Go under Apache-2.0; llm-wiki-compiler is written in TypeScript under MIT. openagent has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, llm-wiki-compiler 11%. openagent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (knowledge-base, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openagent ★ 5.7K llm-wiki-compiler ★ 2.2K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openagent llm-wiki-compiler
GitHub stars ★ 5.7K ★ 2.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-30
Forks ⑂ 673 ⑂ 238
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openagent if

  • You weight community size — 5.7K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openagent profile →

pick llm-wiki-compiler if

  • You want the llm-wiki-compiler feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and llm-wiki-compiler fits your workflow better

full llm-wiki-compiler profile →

About openagent

Next generation personal AI assistant powered by LLM, RAG and agent loops — ships as a single binary, no installation needed Supporting computer use, browser use and coding agent Live Demo · Playground · Docs · Discord English 中文 What is OpenAgent? OpenAgent is an open source personal AI assistant that brings together powerful LLMs, your own knowledge base, and autonomous agent loops — all in one self hostable platform. Connect any model provider, build a RAG knowledge base from your documents, and let agents browse the web, run code, and call any MCP compatible tool on your behalf. Sponsors Thanks to APIMart…

read the full openagent overview →

About llm-wiki-compiler

llmwiki New in 1.3 — A fresh look for your wiki. Meet Scientific Clay, with soft surfaces and rounded typography, and Minimal, which follows your system’s light or dark setting. Switch instantly between four themes, including Nebula Light and Dark. Scientific Clay Minimal The same page in a demonstration wiki. Click either screenshot for a closer look. Recursive source folders, path exclusions, project specific compile instructions, and storage for larger embedding indexes. Configurable Lifecycle Profiles — introduced in 1.0. Build a domain specific wiki with typed records, relationships, lifecycle gates, and…

read the full llm-wiki-compiler overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

Frequently asked questions

Is openagent or llm-wiki-compiler more popular?

openagent has 5,735 GitHub stars and llm-wiki-compiler has 2,235. openagent has the larger community by that measure.

Are openagent and llm-wiki-compiler free?

Both are open source. openagent is licensed under Apache-2.0 and llm-wiki-compiler under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openagent and llm-wiki-compiler?

openagent is written in Go and llm-wiki-compiler in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openagent or llm-wiki-compiler?

Choose openagent if you want the larger community (5,735 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose llm-wiki-compiler if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.