head to head · open source

openagent vs ctx

openagent has 5,628 GitHub stars, 657 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ctx has 587 stars, 71 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. openagent leads on adoption by 859% (5,628 vs 587 stars). openagent is written in Go under Apache-2.0; ctx is written in Python under MIT. openagent has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, ctx 12%. openagent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (harness, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openagent ★ 5.6K ctx ★ 587 category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openagent ctx
GitHub stars ★ 5.6K ★ 587
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 657 ⑂ 71
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openagent if

  • You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openagent profile →

pick ctx if

  • You want the ctx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ctx fits your workflow better

full ctx profile →

About openagent

OpenAgent is an open source, self hostable personal AI assistant written in Go under the Apache 2.0 licence, combining large language models, a retrieval augmented knowledge base, and autonomous agent loops for individuals and teams who want their own assistant running on their own machine.

read the full openagent overview →

About ctx

ctx is a repo aware recommendation engine for AI coding configurations — skills, agents, MCP servers, and model harnesses — built for developers and platform teams who want the cheapest setup that reliably works on their own repository.

read the full ctx overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

openagent vs storybook openagent vs Understand-Anything openagent vs devdocs openagent vs docsify openagent vs wiki openagent vs mkdocs-material openagent vs BookStack openagent vs deepwiki-open openagent vs Docs openagent vs jsdoc openagent vs Skill_Seekers openagent vs gollum

Frequently asked questions

Is openagent or ctx more popular?

openagent has 5,628 GitHub stars and ctx has 587. openagent has the larger community by that measure.

Are openagent and ctx free?

Both are open source. openagent is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ctx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openagent and ctx?

openagent is written in Go and ctx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openagent or ctx?

Choose openagent if you want the larger community (5,628 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ctx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.