head to head · open source

odysseus vs open-spaces

odysseus has 92,145 GitHub stars, 1,411 forks, 1,233 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-spaces has 3,394 stars, 496 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. odysseus leads on adoption by 2,615% (92,145 vs 3,394 stars). odysseus is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; open-spaces is written in JavaScript under MIT. odysseus has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, open-spaces 15%. open-spaces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

odysseus ★ 92K open-spaces ★ 3.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

odysseus open-spaces
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 3.4K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 496
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick odysseus if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full odysseus profile →

pick open-spaces if

  • You want the open-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and open-spaces fits your workflow better

full open-spaces profile →

About odysseus

Odysseus is a self hosted AI workspace written in Python and released under the AGPL 3.0 or later licence, built for people who want chat, agents, research, documents, email, notes, tasks, and calendar in one deployment on infrastructure they control.

read the full odysseus overview →

About open-spaces

OpenSpaces is a free, MIT licensed, self hostable AI workspace that brings shared Spaces, editable pages, conversations, and AI tools into one application, aimed at individuals and teams who want an open alternative to ChatGPT Spaces running on their own infrastructure.

read the full open-spaces overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 391K Hermes Agent ★ 252K Ollama ★ 182K ponytail ★ 158K Dify ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs odysseus ollama vs odysseus openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

odysseus vs OpenClaw odysseus vs Hermes Agent odysseus vs Open WebUI odysseus vs ComfyUI odysseus vs LobeChat odysseus vs AnythingLLM odysseus vs Cherry Studio odysseus vs nanobot odysseus vs LibreChat odysseus vs Jan odysseus vs chatbox odysseus vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is odysseus or open-spaces more popular?

odysseus has 92,145 GitHub stars and open-spaces has 3,394. odysseus has the larger community by that measure.

Are odysseus and open-spaces free?

Both are open source. odysseus is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and open-spaces under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between odysseus and open-spaces?

odysseus is written in Python and open-spaces in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, odysseus or open-spaces?

Choose odysseus if you want the larger community (92,145 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-spaces if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.