head to head · open source

odysseus vs LobeChat

odysseus has 87,357 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 1,233 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. LobeChat has 82,576 stars, 15,895 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. odysseus leads on adoption by 6% (87,357 vs 82,576 stars). odysseus is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. odysseus has attracted 1% as many forks as stars, LobeChat 19%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

odysseus ★ 87K LobeChat ★ 83K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

odysseus LobeChat
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 83K
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 903 ⑂ 16K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick odysseus if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full odysseus profile →

pick LobeChat if

  • You want the LobeChat feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and LobeChat fits your workflow better

full LobeChat profile →

About odysseus

Odysseus is a self hosted AI workspace written in Python and released under the AGPL 3.0 or later licence, built for people who want chat, agents, research, documents, email, notes, tasks, and calendar in one deployment on infrastructure they control.

read the full odysseus overview →

About LobeChat

LobeHub is an open source platform for managing, building, and operating AI agent teams. It functions as a Chief Agent Operator (CAO), enabling users to organize, schedule, and monitor autonomous AI agents around the clock. The project lives in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, integrating with major LLM providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Alibaba’s GLM series.

read the full LobeChat overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

odysseus vs OpenClaw odysseus vs Hermes Agent odysseus vs Open WebUI odysseus vs AnythingLLM odysseus vs Cherry Studio odysseus vs nanobot odysseus vs Jan odysseus vs LibreChat odysseus vs chatbox odysseus vs AstrBot odysseus vs openhuman odysseus vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is odysseus or LobeChat more popular?

odysseus has 87,357 GitHub stars and LobeChat has 82,576. odysseus has the larger community by that measure.

Are odysseus and LobeChat free?

Both are open source. odysseus is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between odysseus and LobeChat?

odysseus is written in Python and LobeChat in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, odysseus or LobeChat?

Choose odysseus if you want the larger community (87,357 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose LobeChat if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.