head to head · open source
open-kritt vs NeuroSploit
open-kritt has 2,406 GitHub stars, 407 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NeuroSploit has 1,499 stars, 357 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. open-kritt leads on adoption by 61% (2,406 vs 1,499 stars). open-kritt is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; NeuroSploit is written in Rust under MIT. open-kritt has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, NeuroSploit 24%. open-kritt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-kritt | NeuroSploit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 2.4K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 407 | ⑂ 357 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-kritt if
- You weight community size — 2.4K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NeuroSploit if
- You want the NeuroSploit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and NeuroSploit fits your workflow better
About open-kritt
open·kritt Orchestrate AI agents to find real vulnerabilities in code. An open source, self hosted security and vulnerability research platform that turns focused AI analysis into de duplicated, ranked findings with configurable validation and enrichment. Website · Documentation · Getting started · Contributing · Owners · Research paper What is open·kritt? Pointing a model at an entire repository and asking it to find vulnerabilities rarely works well. open·kritt takes a focused approach: break the research into small, well defined tasks, run them across AI agents in parallel, and combine their output into…
read the full open-kritt overview →
About NeuroSploit
🧠 NeuroSploit v4.4.0 Autonomous, multi model penetration testing harness — Rust, CLI first. by Joas A Santos & Red Team Leaders What is NeuroSploit? NeuroSploit is an autonomous penetration testing tool. You point it at a target; it does the security assessment on its own and hands you a report — recon, exploitation, chaining findings into real impact, and validation, with no human driving each step. The key idea: the harness is the pentester, not the model. Instead of asking one LLM to "hack this", a Rust engine runs the methodology — it picks the right specialist agents for what it finds, runs them in…
read the full NeuroSploit overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-kritt or NeuroSploit more popular?
open-kritt has 2,406 GitHub stars and NeuroSploit has 1,499. open-kritt has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-kritt and NeuroSploit free?
Both are open source. open-kritt is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and NeuroSploit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-kritt and NeuroSploit?
open-kritt is written in JavaScript and NeuroSploit in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-kritt or NeuroSploit?
Choose open-kritt if you want the larger community (2,406 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose NeuroSploit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.