head to head · open source

odysseus vs photoshop-mcp

odysseus has 87,529 GitHub stars, 948 forks, 1,233 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. photoshop-mcp has 503 stars, 57 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. odysseus leads on adoption by 17,301% (87,529 vs 503 stars). odysseus is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; photoshop-mcp is written in TypeScript under MIT. odysseus has attracted 1% as many forks as stars, photoshop-mcp 11%. photoshop-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

odysseus ★ 88K photoshop-mcp ★ 503 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

odysseus photoshop-mcp
GitHub stars ★ 88K ★ 503
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 948 ⑂ 57
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick odysseus if

  • You weight community size — 88K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full odysseus profile →

pick photoshop-mcp if

  • You want the photoshop-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and photoshop-mcp fits your workflow better

full photoshop-mcp profile →

About odysseus

Odysseus is a self hosted AI workspace written in Python and released under the AGPL 3.0 or later licence, built for people who want chat, agents, research, documents, email, notes, tasks, and calendar in one deployment on infrastructure they control.

read the full odysseus overview →

About photoshop-mcp

Photoshop MCP is a community maintained Model Context Protocol server that lets AI assistants such as Cursor, Claude, and VS Code drive a locally running copy of Adobe Photoshop from plain language instructions, and it is aimed at designers, retouchers, and creative teams who want Photoshop automation without writing scripts or leaving their existing AI tooling.

read the full photoshop-mcp overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 248K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs odysseus ollama vs odysseus openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

odysseus vs OpenClaw odysseus vs Hermes Agent odysseus vs Open WebUI odysseus vs ComfyUI odysseus vs LobeChat odysseus vs AnythingLLM odysseus vs Cherry Studio odysseus vs nanobot odysseus vs LibreChat odysseus vs Jan odysseus vs chatbox odysseus vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is odysseus or photoshop-mcp more popular?

odysseus has 87,529 GitHub stars and photoshop-mcp has 503. odysseus has the larger community by that measure.

Are odysseus and photoshop-mcp free?

Both are open source. odysseus is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and photoshop-mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between odysseus and photoshop-mcp?

odysseus is written in Python and photoshop-mcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, odysseus or photoshop-mcp?

Choose odysseus if you want the larger community (87,529 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose photoshop-mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.