head to head · open source

odysseus vs claude-chat-exporter

odysseus has 87,371 GitHub stars, 907 forks, 1,233 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. claude-chat-exporter has 692 stars, 79 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. odysseus leads on adoption by 12,526% (87,371 vs 692 stars). odysseus is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; claude-chat-exporter is written in JavaScript under MIT. odysseus has attracted 1% as many forks as stars, claude-chat-exporter 11%. odysseus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

odysseus ★ 87K claude-chat-exporter ★ 692 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

odysseus claude-chat-exporter
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 692
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 907 ⑂ 79
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick odysseus if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full odysseus profile →

pick claude-chat-exporter if

  • You want the claude-chat-exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and claude-chat-exporter fits your workflow better

full claude-chat-exporter profile →

About odysseus

Odysseus is a self hosted AI workspace written in Python and released under the AGPL 3.0 or later licence, built for people who want chat, agents, research, documents, email, notes, tasks, and calendar in one deployment on infrastructure they control.

read the full odysseus overview →

About claude-chat-exporter

claude chat exporter is a browser based, privacy first exporter that turns Claude.ai conversations into clean Markdown files with their artifacts, attachments and timestamps intact, built for people who archive chats into an Obsidian vault or feed them into a RAG pipeline.

read the full claude-chat-exporter overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all ollama vs faiss openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

odysseus vs OpenClaw odysseus vs Hermes Agent odysseus vs Open WebUI odysseus vs ComfyUI odysseus vs LobeChat odysseus vs AnythingLLM odysseus vs Cherry Studio odysseus vs nanobot odysseus vs Jan odysseus vs LibreChat odysseus vs chatbox odysseus vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is odysseus or claude-chat-exporter more popular?

odysseus has 87,371 GitHub stars and claude-chat-exporter has 692. odysseus has the larger community by that measure.

Are odysseus and claude-chat-exporter free?

Both are open source. odysseus is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and claude-chat-exporter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between odysseus and claude-chat-exporter?

odysseus is written in Python and claude-chat-exporter in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, odysseus or claude-chat-exporter?

Choose odysseus if you want the larger community (87,371 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose claude-chat-exporter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.