head to head · open source
odysseus vs chatgpt_telegram_bot
odysseus has 94,935 GitHub stars, 1,862 forks, 1,233 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,551 stars, 1,907 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. odysseus leads on adoption by 1,610% (94,935 vs 5,551 stars). odysseus is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; chatgpt_telegram_bot is written in Python under MIT. odysseus has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, chatgpt_telegram_bot 34%. odysseus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| odysseus | chatgpt_telegram_bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 95K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick odysseus if
- You weight community size — 95K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatgpt_telegram_bot if
- You want the chatgpt_telegram_bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and chatgpt_telegram_bot fits your workflow better
About odysseus
A self hosted AI workspace for chat, agents, research, documents, email, notes, calendar, and local model workflows. Quick Start · Setup Guide · Contributing · Roadmap Quick Start dev is the default branch and gets the newest changes first. Use main if you want the more curated branch. Open when the containers are healthy. The first admin password is printed in docker compose logs odysseus . Native installs, GPU notes, Windows/macOS instructions, HTTPS, and configuration live in the setup guide. Features Chat + Agents — local/API models, tools, MCP, files, shell, skills, and memory. Cookbook — hardware aware…
read the full odysseus overview →
About chatgpt_telegram_bot
🤖 ChatGPT Telegram Bot ChatGPT, re created as a Telegram bot — and it works great. GPT 5.5 · Anthropic Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku) · Vision · Voice · Image generation Fast replies, no daily limits, message streaming and 15 special chat modes. Web chatbots are great — but they're often laggy, rate limited, and locked behind a browser tab. This project puts the best models from OpenAI and Anthropic right inside Telegram , with your own API keys and no daily limits. 🚀 Try the live bot: @jadvebot · 🌐 Web: jadve.com — or deploy your own in two commands (Quick start ↓). ✨ Features ⚡ Low latency — replies usually…
read the full chatgpt_telegram_bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is odysseus or chatgpt_telegram_bot more popular?
odysseus has 94,935 GitHub stars and chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,551. odysseus has the larger community by that measure.
Are odysseus and chatgpt_telegram_bot free?
Both are open source. odysseus is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and chatgpt_telegram_bot under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between odysseus and chatgpt_telegram_bot?
odysseus is written in Python and chatgpt_telegram_bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, odysseus or chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Choose odysseus if you want the larger community (94,935 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose chatgpt_telegram_bot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.