head to head · open source

ODS vs f-flow

ODS has 6,607 GitHub stars, 943 forks, 2,618 open issues and last shipped today. f-flow has 530 stars, 63 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. ODS leads on adoption by 1,147% (6,607 vs 530 stars). ODS is written in Python under Apache-2.0; f-flow is written in TypeScript under MIT. ODS has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, f-flow 12%. ODS was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ODS ★ 6.6K f-flow ★ 530 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ODS f-flow
GitHub stars ★ 6.6K ★ 530
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 943 ⑂ 63
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ODS if

  • You weight community size — 6.6K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ODS profile →

pick f-flow if

  • You want the f-flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and f-flow fits your workflow better

full f-flow profile →

About ODS

ODS (Osmantic Deployment System) is a Python based, Apache 2.0 licensed installer and runtime that turns a personal computer running Linux, macOS, or Windows into a private AI server. It lives in the self hosted local AI ecosystem alongside the components it wires together: Ollama, Open WebUI, n8n, ComfyUI, and a set of privacy tools. Rather than asking an operator to assemble those projects by hand, ODS installs the stack, selects a model suited to the detected hardware, starts the services, and exposes a local web interface. The repository root holds the public README, installers, security policy, and coordinat…

read the full ODS overview →

About f-flow

Foblex Flow is an MIT licensed, TypeScript, Angular native node editor library for teams building production workflow builders, AI pipelines, and interactive diagram editors, and it is aimed at Angular developers who want drag, connection, selection, and zoom behaviour without adopting a separate state model.

read the full f-flow overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

ODS vs n8n ODS vs ProxmoxVE ODS vs ActivePieces ODS vs LiveKit ODS vs amis ODS vs Windmill ODS vs Botpress ODS vs mitosis ODS vs Automatisch ODS vs puck ODS vs Typebot ODS vs cadence

Frequently asked questions

Is ODS or f-flow more popular?

ODS has 6,607 GitHub stars and f-flow has 530. ODS has the larger community by that measure.

Are ODS and f-flow free?

Both are open source. ODS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and f-flow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ODS and f-flow?

ODS is written in Python and f-flow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ODS or f-flow?

Choose ODS if you want the larger community (6,607 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose f-flow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.