head to head · open source

octo-server vs plugNmeet-server

octo-server has 1,059 GitHub stars, 165 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. plugNmeet-server has 537 stars, 119 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped today. octo-server leads on adoption by 97% (1,059 vs 537 stars). octo-server is written in Go under Apache-2.0; plugNmeet-server is written in Go under MIT. octo-server has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, plugNmeet-server 22%. plugNmeet-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

octo-server ★ 1.1K plugNmeet-server ★ 537 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

octo-server plugNmeet-server
GitHub stars ★ 1.1K ★ 537
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 165 ⑂ 119
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick octo-server if

  • You weight community size — 1.1K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full octo-server profile →

pick plugNmeet-server if

  • You want the plugNmeet-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and plugNmeet-server fits your workflow better

full plugNmeet-server profile →

About octo-server

octo server is the Go backend at the centre of OCTO, an open workplace built for humans and AI agents, and it is aimed at teams that want to self host a collaboration platform where Lobster agents participate in conversations as first class members.

read the full octo-server overview →

About plugNmeet-server

Plug N Meet is an MIT licensed, self hosted web conferencing system written in Go that runs on LiveKit's WebRTC infrastructure and is meant for teams, developers, and organizations that want to embed video meetings with an AI meeting agent into their own websites, applications, or systems.

read the full plugNmeet-server overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

octo-server vs Plane octo-server vs Rocket.Chat octo-server vs cobalt octo-server vs Buzz octo-server vs Jitsi octo-server vs srs octo-server vs Huly octo-server vs Zulip octo-server vs etherpad octo-server vs drawnix octo-server vs univer octo-server vs chat

Frequently asked questions

Is octo-server or plugNmeet-server more popular?

octo-server has 1,059 GitHub stars and plugNmeet-server has 537. octo-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are octo-server and plugNmeet-server free?

Both are open source. octo-server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and plugNmeet-server under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between octo-server and plugNmeet-server?

octo-server is written in Go and plugNmeet-server in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, octo-server or plugNmeet-server?

Choose octo-server if you want the larger community (1,059 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose plugNmeet-server if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.