head to head · open source
obscura vs jumpcutter
obscura has 30,348 GitHub stars, 2,298 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped yesterday. jumpcutter has 679 stars, 28 forks, 126 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. obscura leads on adoption by 4,370% (30,348 vs 679 stars). obscura is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; jumpcutter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. obscura has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, jumpcutter 4%. obscura was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| obscura | jumpcutter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 679 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 28 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick obscura if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jumpcutter if
- You want the jumpcutter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and jumpcutter fits your workflow better
About obscura
Obscura The open source headless browser for AI agents and web scraping. Lightweight, stealthy, and built in Rust. Native rendering is here. No Chromium required. 🎉 Capture screenshots, screencast live pages, and export PDFs directly with Obscura. Obscura is a headless browser engine written in Rust, built for web scraping and AI agent automation. It runs real JavaScript via V8, supports the Chrome DevTools Protocol, and acts as a drop in replacement for headless Chrome with Puppeteer and Playwright. Why Obscura over headless Chrome? Obscura inspired Cloudflare Kitesurf’s first prototype Cloudflare began by…
read the full obscura overview →
About jumpcutter
Jump Cutter [ ][chrome web store] [ ][addons mozilla org] [ ][weblate] Download: [ ][chrome web store] [ ][addons mozilla org] [ ][microsoft edge addons] or from GitHub: Chromium / Gecko (Firefox) Skips silent parts in videos, in real time. Can be useful for watching lectures, stream recordings (VODs), webinars, podcasts, and other unedited videos. Demo: Inspired by this video by carykh. How it works Simple (mostly). Currently there are 2 separate algorithms in place. The first one we call "the stretching algorithm", and it's in this file. It simply looks at the output audio of a media element, determines its…
read the full jumpcutter overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is obscura or jumpcutter more popular?
obscura has 30,348 GitHub stars and jumpcutter has 679. obscura has the larger community by that measure.
Are obscura and jumpcutter free?
Both are open source. obscura is licensed under Apache-2.0 and jumpcutter under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between obscura and jumpcutter?
obscura is written in Rust and jumpcutter in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, obscura or jumpcutter?
Choose obscura if you want the larger community (30,348 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose jumpcutter if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.