head to head · open source
NocoBase vs extension.js
NocoBase has 24,256 GitHub stars, 2,876 forks, 307 open issues and last shipped yesterday. extension.js has 5,159 stars, 139 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoBase leads on adoption by 370% (24,256 vs 5,159 stars). NocoBase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; extension.js is written in TypeScript under MIT. NocoBase has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, extension.js 3%. extension.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoBase | extension.js | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 5.2K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 139 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoBase if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick extension.js if
- You want the extension.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and extension.js fits your workflow better
About NocoBase
NocoBase is an open source AI plus no code platform, written in TypeScript, for teams and non developers who need to build and run internal business systems such as admin dashboards, CRM, and ERP tooling.
read the full NocoBase overview →
About extension.js
extension.js is an open source cross browser extension framework written in TypeScript under the MIT license. It targets Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari, and it lets developers build extensions without a separate build configuration for each browser.
read the full extension.js overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoBase or extension.js more popular?
NocoBase has 24,256 GitHub stars and extension.js has 5,159. NocoBase has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoBase and extension.js free?
Both are open source. NocoBase has no licence declared in this registry, and extension.js is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoBase and extension.js?
NocoBase is written in TypeScript and extension.js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoBase or extension.js?
Choose NocoBase if you want the larger community (24,256 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose extension.js if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.