head to head · open source

NocoBase vs DependencyCheck

NocoBase has 24,256 GitHub stars, 2,876 forks, 307 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DependencyCheck has 7,695 stars, 1,419 forks, 195 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoBase leads on adoption by 215% (24,256 vs 7,695 stars). NocoBase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; DependencyCheck is written in Java under Apache-2.0. NocoBase has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, DependencyCheck 18%. NocoBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoBase ★ 24K DependencyCheck ★ 7.7K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoBase DependencyCheck
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 7.7K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoBase if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoBase profile →

pick DependencyCheck if

  • You want the DependencyCheck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and DependencyCheck fits your workflow better

full DependencyCheck profile →

About NocoBase

NocoBase is an open source AI plus no code platform, written in TypeScript, for teams and non developers who need to build and run internal business systems such as admin dashboards, CRM, and ERP tooling.

read the full NocoBase overview →

About DependencyCheck

Dependency Check is an OWASP Software Composition Analysis (SCA) utility that detects publicly disclosed vulnerabilities in a project's dependencies by resolving Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) identifiers and linking each match to its associated CVE entries, and it is built for developers, build engineers and security teams who need that check to run automatically inside Maven, Gradle, Ant, Jenkins or command line builds.

read the full DependencyCheck overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

NocoBase vs vite NocoBase vs webpack NocoBase vs Appwrite NocoBase vs parcel NocoBase vs Harness NocoBase vs Dokku NocoBase vs turborepo NocoBase vs nx NocoBase vs gradle NocoBase vs rspack NocoBase vs devbox NocoBase vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoBase or DependencyCheck more popular?

NocoBase has 24,256 GitHub stars and DependencyCheck has 7,695. NocoBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoBase and DependencyCheck free?

Both are open source. NocoBase has no licence declared in this registry, and DependencyCheck is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoBase and DependencyCheck?

NocoBase is written in TypeScript and DependencyCheck in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoBase or DependencyCheck?

Choose NocoBase if you want the larger community (24,256 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose DependencyCheck if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.