head to head · open source
NeuroSploit vs hacktheweb
NeuroSploit has 1,532 GitHub stars, 365 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hacktheweb has 1,311 stars, 286 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NeuroSploit leads on adoption by 17% (1,532 vs 1,311 stars). NeuroSploit is written in Rust under MIT; hacktheweb is written in Python under MIT. NeuroSploit has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, hacktheweb 22%. hacktheweb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-security, cybersecurity, ethical-hacking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NeuroSploit | hacktheweb | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1.5K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Rust | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 365 | ⑂ 286 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NeuroSploit if
- You weight community size — 1.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick hacktheweb if
- You want the hacktheweb feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and hacktheweb fits your workflow better
About NeuroSploit
🧠 NeuroSploit v4.4.0 Autonomous, multi model penetration testing harness — Rust, CLI first. by Joas A Santos & Red Team Leaders What is NeuroSploit? NeuroSploit is an autonomous penetration testing tool. You point it at a target; it does the security assessment on its own and hands you a report — recon, exploitation, chaining findings into real impact, and validation, with no human driving each step. The key idea: the harness is the pentester, not the model. Instead of asking one LLM to "hack this", a Rust engine runs the methodology — it picks the right specialist agents for what it finds, runs them in…
read the full NeuroSploit overview →
About hacktheweb
HackTheWeb AI Powered Web Application Penetration Testing Framework Automated security testing with intelligent decision making Website • Features • Installation • Usage • Documentation 🪙 Official Token Contract Address (CA) [!IMPORTANT] Official Contract Address (Solana): • Network: Solana (pump.fun) • Security Notice: Always verify the contract address matches this official repository. Never trust unverified third parties. 🎯 Overview HackTheWeb is a production ready, AI powered web application penetration testing tool designed for security professionals and ethical hackers. It uses rule based artificial…
read the full hacktheweb overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NeuroSploit or hacktheweb more popular?
NeuroSploit has 1,532 GitHub stars and hacktheweb has 1,311. NeuroSploit has the larger community by that measure.
Are NeuroSploit and hacktheweb free?
Both are open source. NeuroSploit is licensed under MIT and hacktheweb under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between NeuroSploit and hacktheweb?
NeuroSploit is written in Rust and hacktheweb in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NeuroSploit or hacktheweb?
Choose NeuroSploit if you want the larger community (1,532 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose hacktheweb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.